Search: Site   Web
The Daily Chisme ~ What is Today's Headline!

Illegal Immigration Defies Culture Crowd Definition

April 11th, 2008, 9:34 am · 6 Comments · posted by Joaquin

The immigrant had lived the American dream.

A 41-year-old father of three, he owned two homes, some commercial property and ran and owned a successful heating and cooling business.

“I earned the respect of my clients,” said the immigrant, who put down roots in Chicago.

One big problem, though, this immigrant to America was here illegally. He didn’t cross a border. He didn’t climb over some ill-begotten border fence. His last name doesn’t fit the stereotype fashioned by the right-wing culture crowd on talk radio and cable television.

No, Andrezj Derezinski came to the U.S. in an entire legal manner 18 years ago. He stepped on American soil via a valid visa and passport. But Derezinski, or “Peter,” as he was called in the U.S., stayed in the country after his visa expired, becoming one of the nearly six million illegal immigrants who became undocumented in this manner. All told, up to 45 percent of the 12 million undocumented immigrants in the U.S. are visa overstayers.

You don’t hear much about these sort of illegal immigrants from the right-wing culture crowd. CNN’s resident hatemonger, Lou Dobbs, doesn’t have any storylines with the words “Broken Visas,” headlining any of the reports on his slanted program. You won’t hear Fox News fathead Sean Hannity every push a guest on his show with questions like: “Mr. Homeland Security Secretary, when are we finally going to secure our leaky visa system?”

Nope. For the right-wing culture crowd it’s all about broken borders and securing the border, (the southern one, of course, nary a mention of the little country of Canada to our north), and so an illegal immigrant named Derezinski isn’t going to being demonized on CNN’s daily diatribe on broken borders. It doesn’t fit the script, the stereotype always being nurtured and pushed by the right-wing culture types who have assigned themsleves the task of protecting America’s sovereignty and purity from the Mexican hordes.

It would be informative for Dobbs, Hannity and their demagogic ilk to read the page 1 story in this past Thursday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal. In a rare piece of reporting that goes beyond the usual media framework about how all illegal immigrants are Mexicans, the Journal story not only tells the story of Derezinski, the Polish illegal alien, but also details how many such immigrants fit his description.

Relatively few of the illegal aliens who are visa overstayers are from Latin American countries. The vast majority are from European countries, (i.e. Polish, British, French), and then followed by visa overstayers from the Phillippines, India, Korea, China and Vietnam. Gee, are they, too, crowding our public schools, using our medical and health care facilities, and all on food stamps, too, just like the Mexicans?

No, Derezinski, like the vast majority of Latin American immigrants here illegally, are hard-working, pay taxes, own property in many cases, and are raising American-born children. In Chicago alone, the Journal reports that there are about 70,000 Polish illegal immigrants, second only to the city’s undocumented Mexican population.

“Illegal immigration isn’t just a Latino issue,” said Frank Spula, president of the Polish-American Alliance, in the Journal article. “Polish people who overstayed their visas are here with family and property, and they just can’t pack up and leave.”

Gee, sound familiar? Sorry, Mr. Derezinski, what part of illegal don’t you understand?

And so, on April 10, the day the Journal story was published, Andrezj “Peter” Derezinski was deported back to Poland, leaving his American wife and three U.S.-born children behind. America, after all, can’t afford to have such hardened criminals in our midst.

Joaquin C. Tijerina, Official Chisme Blogger

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

6 Responses to “Illegal Immigration Defies Culture Crowd Definition”

  1. Reggie Jefferson Says:

    “America, after all, can’t afford to have such hardened criminals in our midst.”

    What a stupid, smarmy quote. The enforcement of the laws allow us to deport dangerous criminals. Is it perfect? Of course not, but if it results in raping and murdering aliens off American streeets, I’m all for it.

  2. Joaquin Says:

    Between smarmy and stupid, I’d choose smarmy.
    No one disputes the right of the federal government to deport anyone here illegally, be they from Poland or Mexico. I don’t think the immigrant described above, and others like him, would rape or murder anyone.
    That doesn’t entitle him, or others like him to stay here, but to lump them with rapists and murders is,shall we say, crass, perhaps obtuse.

  3. George Lopez Says:

    “There have been dozens of national studies examining immigration and crime, and they all come to the same conclusion: immigrants are more law-abiding than citizens. A 2007 study by the Immigration Policy Center found that immigrants, whether legal or illegal, are substantally less likely to commit crimes or to be incarcerated than U.S. citizens.
    “For example: At the same time that immigration has reached or surpassed historic highs, crime rates have declined, notably in cities with large numbers of undocumented immigrants, including San Diego and El Paso.
    “Incarceration rates for native-born men in the 18-39 age group was five times higher than for foreign-born men in the same age group..
    “Data from the census and other sources show that for every ethnic group, incarceration rates among young men are lowest for immigrants, even those who are less educated and acculturated.”
    Source: Center for International Policy
    What I find smarmy, maybe stupid, is saying an immigrant, like the Polish guy in the Wall Street Journal article is someone who who could commit horrible crimes. The guy owned a second home for goodness sakes. I wish I was doing that well.

  4. Reggie Jefferson Says:

    “What I find smarmy, maybe stupid, is saying an immigrant, like the Polish guy in the Wall Street Journal article is someone who who could commit horrible crimes.”

    We need some better reading comprehension here. I never said that I thought that the man described in the article would commit those serious crimes, but if you are selective in enforcing the LAWS then the laws become meaningless. How would you feel if you Jamiel Shaw was your friend or family? For the benefit of legal Americans, we should err on the side of caution.

    “The guy owned a second home for goodness sakes.”

    I’m pretty sure that the amount of homes owned doesn’t indicate whether you are a criminal or not (once again, I don’t think this man is a criminal).

  5. Michael Says:

    Isnt it odd that all the people opposing the border fence happen to have a fence around their house?

  6. Joaquin Says:

    Isn’t it odd how simplistic an analogy it is to equate the building of a fence around a house to building one around a country?

Leave a Reply

Jobs
Auto
Real Estate
Classifieds
Place an Ad
Jobs in Brownsville
   
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site